USPTO serial 78155137
UNIBALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNIBALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Z. Peter Sawicki
Z PETER SAWICKI WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KELLYSTE 1400 INTERNATIONAL CTR 900 2NMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3319UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Clamps for surgical retractors | ACTIVE | Oct 17, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |