Drawing for JACOB & CO.

USPTO serial 78155805

JACOB & CO.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JACOB & CO.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica B. Richman

Monica B. Richman Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP875 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10014UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal key chainsACTIVE
009EyeglassesACTIVE
018Handbags; wallets and leather key chainsACTIVE
026Belt buckles not of precious metalACTIVE
043Hotels, restaurants and barsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 31, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Aug 28, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Aug 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Oct 1, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Sep 30, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Sep 20, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 20, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Sep 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 2, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 25, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 16, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 13, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 20, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 14, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 23, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance