USPTO serial 78155805
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica B. Richman
Monica B. Richman Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP875 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10014UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |