Drawing for COOGI

USPTO serial 78162496

COOGI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COOGI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM H. COX

WILLIAM H COX JANVEY GORDON HERLANDS RANDOLPH ET AL355 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps, facial scrubs, body scrubs, hair gels, bath gels, scented water, toilet water, cosmetic cold creams, cosmetic body lotions, cosmetic hand lotions, mascaras, eyeliners, eye shadows, makeup removers, lipsticks, foundation bases, and makeup powders; fragrances, namely, perfumes and colognes, body lotions, body gels, body creams, and body soapsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Apr 3, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 4, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 10, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 2, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 4, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 26, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 3, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 19, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 17, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 19, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 10, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 31, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 31, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 15, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 14, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 25, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
May 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance