Drawing for COOGI

USPTO serial 78162496

COOGI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COOGI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM H. COX

WILLIAM H COX JANVEY GORDON HERLANDS RANDOLPH ET AL355 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps, facial scrubs, body scrubs, hair gels, bath gels, scented water, toilet water, cosmetic cold creams, cosmetic body lotions, cosmetic hand lotions, mascaras, eyeliners, eye shadows, makeup removers, lipsticks, foundation bases, and makeup powders; fragrances, namely, perfumes and colognes, body lotions, body gels, body creams, and body soapsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 26, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 19, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 10, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 14, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance