USPTO serial 78165741
DIRTY HARRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3058116Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 7, 2006
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIRTY HARRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WAUKEGAN, IL
WAUKEGAN, IL
WAUKEGAN, IL
BURBANK, CA
WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.
BURBANK, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN P. MACALUSO
STEVEN P MACALUSO WMS GAMING INC800 S NORTHPOINT BLVDWAUKEGAN, IL 60085UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CURRENCY AND CREDIT OPERATED SLOT MACHINES AND GAMING DEVICES, NAMELY, GAMING MACHINES FOR USE IN GAMING ESTABLISHMENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 12, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WMS GAMING INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WMS GAMING INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WMS GAMING INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WARNER BROS. CONSUMER BROS.
- Other trademarks owned by WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DIRTY HARRY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 11, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 25, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |