USPTO serial 78166893
THE SUGAR CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SUGAR CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy B. Goldsmith, Esq.
AMY B GOLDSMITH GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, PC270 MADISON AVE 8TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | EDIBLE OILS, EDIBLE FATS; OLIVE OIL; EGGS, PICKLES; MILK; DAIRY PRODUCTS EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT; PREPARED MEALS CONTAINING MEAT, FISH, POULTRY, GAME, VEGETABLES AND/OR TOFU | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | TEA; TEA BASED BEVERAGES WITH FRUIT FLAVORING; TEA ESSENCES AND TEA EXTRACTS USED AS FLAVORINGS; TEA BAGS, POWERED TEA; FRUIT TEAS; ICED TEA; GREEN TEA; COFFEE; COCOA; RICE; TAPIOCA; SPICES; BREAD; YEAST; BAKING POWDER; BISCUITS; CAKES; PASTA; PASTRY; MEAT PIES, VEGETABLE PIES; FRUIT PIES; PIE MIXES; PREPARED MEALS CONTAINING PASTA, BREAD CEREALS AND/OR PASTRY; ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURTS; CONDIMENTS, NAMELY, RELISHES, VINEGARETTES, SALAD DRESSINGS; PASTES, NAMELY, CURRY PASTES, TANDOORI PASTES AND MARINADES; DUKAH; SAMBAL | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES AND ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FOOD AND BEVERAGE PRODUCTS, PREPARED FOODS, KITCHEN UTENSILS, COOKING UTENSILS AND COOK BOOKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sumner, Ashley
- Other trademarks owned by Sumner, Ashley
- Other trademarks owned by Hayman, Vivienne
- Other trademarks owned by Hayman, Vivienne
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named THE SUGAR CLUB
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |