Drawing for THE BRIDGES

USPTO serial 78175836

THE BRIDGES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE BRIDGES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN M. HOFFBERG

STEVEN M. HOFFBERG HOFFBERG & ASSOCIATES29 Buckout RoadSuite 101West Harrison, NY 10604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Management of real properties, relating to residential condominium properties.ACTIVESep 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 8, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 8, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 20, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 15, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 12, 2005MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Jul 12, 2005ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Jul 12, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2005CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jan 10, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Aug 21, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 21, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 12, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 10, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED
May 8, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance