USPTO serial 78177755
IMAGE GUIDED TARGETING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMAGE GUIDED TARGETING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kirchheim/Heimstetten, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Don W. Bulson, Esq.
DON W BULSON RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR LLP1621 EUCLID AVE - 19TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44115UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; computer software; computer, Internet and Internet-based software for use in neurosurgical, orthopedic, radiotherapeutic and radiosurgical purposes, for robot-assisted applications, for application in ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery, for application to three-dimensional registration and referencing patient data, for characterizing structures in patient data produced using medical image forming apparatus, for indicating contours of anatomical structures in image displays, for automatically recognizing anatomical structures, and for assisting in the operation of medical devices having tactile or contact signaling tips; pre-recorded data carriers featuring computer software, namely, computer software for neurosurgical, orthopedic, radiotherapeutic and radiosurgical purposes, for robot-assisted applications, for application in ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery, for application to three-dimensional registration and referencing patient data, for characterizing structures in patient data produced using medical image forming apparatus, for indicating contours of anatomical structures in image displays, for automatically recognizing anatomical structures, and for assisting in the operation of medical devices having tactile or contact signaling tips; electrical connection cables | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Electronic apparatus and image presentation apparatus for medical purposes; electronic apparatus and image presentation apparatus for surgical robots, for application in image-guided localization systems for surgical purposes; neurosurgical instruments and apparatus; medical and surgical robots and accessories therefor; control boxes; instrument adaptors; tool holders; adaptors for endoscopes and microscopes; radiotherapeutic and radiosurgical apparatus; devices to acquire and adjust radiation points for medical purposes; systems and components to precisely position patients for radiotherapeutic, radiosurgical or neurosurgical purposes, comprising collimators, infrared and video cameras and accessories, patient markers, monitors, isocenter phantoms, calibration phantoms, patient trays, head holders and adaptors, vacuum pumps, vacuum cushions, referencing stars, ultrasound phantoms, ultrasound adaptors, x-ray registration kits, and tomographs; intra-operative, image-guided localization systems and components for neurosurgical, orthopedic, stereotactic, radiotherapeutical or radiosurgical purposes, and for application in ear, nose and throat surgery, comprising cameras, monitors, image presentation apparatus, computers, reference clamps, pointers, surgical instruments, registration markers and marker spheres, body markers, cannulae, laptops, docking stations, panels, panel parts, headsets, headrings, remote controls, probes, sensors, instrument adaptors, virtual keyboards, dental referencing devices, laser pointers, phantom pointers; systems and components for software-controlled treatment in neurosurgery, orthopedics, radiotherapy or radiosurgery and in ear, nose, and throat surgery, including localizers, stereotactic or neurosurgical arcs, biopsy kits, fixation adaptors, instrument calibration matrixes and fixation rings, planning stations, computers, couchmounts, collimators, target positioners, film holders, mask systems, couch stabilizers, couch adaptors, radiation devices, linear accelerators, gantries, microscope adaptors, fixation pins, head and neck immobilization devices; instruments and apparatus for three-dimensional registration or referencing of patients; instruments and apparatus for characterizing structures in patient data produced using medical image forming apparatus, for indicating contours of anatomical structures in image displays, for automatically recognizing anatomical structures, and for assisting in the operation of medical devices having tactile or contact signaling tips; reference markers or marker arrangements designed for attachment to surgical instruments or devices; light pointers; pointer devices for registration purposes, having tactile or contact signalling tips | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer program services, namely developing programs for medical purposes, and more particularly for developing programs for neurosurgical, orthopedic, radiotherapeutic and radiosurgical purposes, for robot-assisted applications, for application in ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery, for application to three-dimensional registration or referencing patient data, for characterizing structures in patient data produced using medical image forming apparatus, for indicating contours of anatomical structures in image displays, for automatically recognizing anatomical structures, and for assisting in the operation of medical devices having tactile or contact signaling tips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |