USPTO serial 78178421
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER F. WEINBERG
PETER F WEINBERG GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP1801 CALIFORNIA STDENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Inventory control and inventory management in the field of healthcare products; procurement, namely, purchasing healthcare products for others; operating on-line marketplaces for sellers of goods and/or services; benchmarking and business process consulting regarding healthcare supply management; monitoring and tracking of package shipments | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software in the field of supply chain management in the healthcare field and value-added network (VAN) and document delivery for suppliers; data management, reporting and information services; reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with purchasing contracts | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |