USPTO serial 78181219
SAFGARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2004
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAFGARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
COMPUTERIZED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
Troy, MI
Other trademarks owned by COMPUTERIZED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
COMPUTERIZED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
Troy, MI
Other trademarks owned by COMPUTERIZED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
COMPUTERIZED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
Madison Heights, MI
Other trademarks owned by COMPUTERIZED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric P. Stevens
Eric P. Stevens Poyner Spruill LLP301 Fayetteville St., Suite 1900Raleigh, NC 27601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF ELECTRONIC ENTRY LOCKS AND CONTROLS THEREFORE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUTERIZED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUTERIZED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUTERIZED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named SAFGARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 16, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 16, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 17, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |