USPTO serial 78181930
ERECTOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2995725Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2005
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ERECTOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BOCA RATON, FL
Boca Raton, FL
Boca Raton, FL
Boca Raton, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell J. Weinstein, Esq.
Mitchell J. Weinstein, Esq. LEVENFELD PEARLSTEIN LLC2 N LASALLE STREET SUITE 1300CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | nutritional and dietary supplements, namely, herbal preparations for the treatment of male penile dysfunction | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 30, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WEINSTEIN, ERIC
- Other trademarks owned by Centennial Health, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Centennial Health, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Centennial Health, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named ERECTOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 23, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 24, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |