USPTO serial 78183617
FINCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FINCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Hobbs, Jr.
MICHAEL D HOBBS JR TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP600 PEACHTREE ST NESUITE 5200ATLANTA GA, US 30308UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Athletic footwear; athletic apparel, namely softball t-shirts, softball jerseys, softball shorts and softball pants | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |