Drawing for SUDACARE

USPTO serial 78184002

SUDACARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUDACARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard A. Friedman

RICHARD A FRIEDMAN PFIZER INC201 TABOR RD LEGAL TRADEMARKS 562-SMORRIS PLAINS NJ, 07950U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for use in connection with upper respiratory conditionsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 12, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Sep 29, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 29, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 29, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 29, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 11, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Feb 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 17, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 16, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Dec 4, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance