USPTO serial 78185528
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Goldenberg
DAVID S GOLDENBERG FLYNN THIEL BOUTELL & TANIS PC2026 RAMBLING RDKALAMAZOO, MI 49008-1699UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Architectural design services for surgical theaters and operating rooms. | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |