USPTO serial 78185603
PETE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PETE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor Flores
F DAVID LARIVIERE LARIVIERE, GRUBMAN & PAYNE, LLPPO BOX 314019 UPPER RAGSDALE DR STE 200MONTEREY, CA 93942Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, games and playthings, namely, action figures, bendable toys, toy action figures, toy figures, toy figures and figurines made of rubber, plastic, and common metal, stuffed toys, and plush toys | ACTIVE | Jun 6, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MONSTER CABLE PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MONSTER CABLE PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MONSTER, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named PETE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |