USPTO serial 78188493
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
STEPHEN L BAKER BAKER AND RANNELLS PA575 ROUTE 28SUITE 102RARITAN, NJ 08869| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical instruments, namely, scalpels, blades and staplers; medical instruments, namely, stethoscopes, medical syringes; dental instruments, namely picks, burrs, mirrors; and veterinary instruments, namely, scalpels, blades and staplers; artificial limbs, eyes and teeth, orthopaedic articles, namely, orthopaedic belts, braces, footwear; prostheses, namely prosthetic limbs, hands, breasts; dental implants; sutures; synthetic materials for biomedical applications, namely, synthetic bone substitutes; biomedical materials, namely, synthetic bone substitutes, and other synthetic tissue for use in the human body; bone implants composed of artificial material; bone grafts comprised of artificial materials; surgically implantable bone scaffold; bone coatings, namely, calcium phosphate coating, sold as an integral component of synthetic bone and prostheses | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research; technical research in the field of biomedical materials and biomedical applications; design for others in the field of biomedical applications and biomedical materials; scientific research in the biomedical field, and in the field of biomechanics | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services; veterinary services; hygienic and beauty care for human beings or animals, namely, beauty salon services and animal grooming services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |