USPTO serial 78189711
PHOTOMED TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3459264Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 2008
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PHOTOMED TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. BENJAMIN BORSON
D. BENJAMIN BORSON BORSON LAW GROUP, PC1078 Carol LaneSUITE 200Lafayette, CA 94549-4760Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Developing apparatus and equipment for using electromagnetic radiation for treating disorders; developing computer hardware and component operating software therefor for use in conjunction with apparatus and equipment for using electromagnetic radiation for treating disorders | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 17, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PhotoMed Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PhotoMed Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PhotoMed Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PHOTOMED TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 27, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |