USPTO serial 78189906
SMOCKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMOCKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hermosa Beach, CA
Hermosa Beach, CA
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |