Drawing for PACKY PLAYFAIR

USPTO serial 78192916

PACKY PLAYFAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PACKY PLAYFAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W DREW KASTNER

W DREW KASTNER ESQ JONES DAY222 E 41ST STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009CALCULATORS, SUNGLASSES, AND COMPUTER GAMES, NAMELY COMPUTER GAMES SOFTWARE FOR PLAY ON CD ROM, OVER THE INTERNET, ON HAND-HELD ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION DEVICES, AND ON ELECTRONIC GAME CONSOLESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 21, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 15, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jun 8, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 16, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 16, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 25, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 24, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 14, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 28, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 21, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 31, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 22, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 12, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 11, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 23, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jul 25, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jul 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 18, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance