USPTO serial 78194940
VIELLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIELLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DIANE J MASON
DIANE J MASON DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP555 CALIFORNIA ST STE 1000SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4187UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR TOPICAL USE FOR THE TREATMENT, THERAPY AMELIORATION OF FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, FEMALE SEXUAL DISORDER, FEMALE ORGASM LATENCY, FEMALE ORGASM INTENSITY; LUBRICANTS FOR MEDICAL USE IN THE TREATMENT, THERAPY, AMELIORATION OF FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, FEMALE SEXUAL DISORDER, FEMALE ORGASM LATENCY, FEMALE ORGASM INTENSITY; LUBRICATING MOISTURIZING JELLY FOR THE SKIN FOR MEDICAL USE IN THE TREATMENT, THERAPY, AMELIORATION OF FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, FEMALE SEXUAL ORGASM, FEMALE SEXUAL LATENCY, FEMALE ORGASM INTENSITY; GELS FOR MEDICAL USE IN THE TREATMENT, THERAPY, AMELIORATION OF FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, FEMALE SEXUAL DISORDER, FEMALE ORGASM LATENCY, FEMALE ORGASM INTENSITY; OILS ADAPTED FOR MEDICAL USE IN THE TREATMENT, THERAPY, AMELIORATION OF FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, FEMALE SEXUAL DISORDER, FEMALE ORGASM LATENCY, FEMALE ORGASM INTENSITY; PLASTICS IMPREGNATED WITH LUBRICANTS FOR MEDICAL USE IN THE TREATMENT, THERAPY, AMELIORATION OF FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, FEMALE SEXUAL DISORDER, FEMALE ORGASM LATENCY, FEMALE ORGASM INTENSITY | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Apparatus for medical purposes for use in relation to the female human sexual response aid for the control and treatment of female incontinence; therapeutic medical exercise apparatus for the strengthening, toning or the movement of muscles; medical apparatus for introducing pharmaceutical preparations into the human body; devices for the delivery or administration of medicines or of pharmaceuticals for contraception; devices for the delivery or the administration of medicines or of pharmaceuticals for fertility indication and for the promotion of conception; devices, apparatus and instruments for the application of medical or pharmaceutical compositions to or through the skin for the treatment of female sexual dysfunction, female sexual disorder, female orgasm latency, and female hyperactive sexual desire disorder; adult sexual aids, namely, sex prosthesis, electronic clitoral stimulators; body massage devices; electronic and non-electronic vibrators; non-electronic finger-held clitoral stimulators and parts for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |