Drawing for PAUL BUNYAN

USPTO serial 78197686

PAUL BUNYAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAUL BUNYAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan B. Flohr

SUSAN B FLOHR BLANK ROME LLP600 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008cutlery, namely collectors knivesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 9, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 9, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 9, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jun 2, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jun 2, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Mar 17, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 17, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 15, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 27, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 19, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Feb 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 16, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance