USPTO serial 78199415
EARLY WARNING SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EARLY WARNING SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CAROLINE L. KELLER
CAROLINE L KELLER PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN725 S FIGUEROA ST STE 2800LOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | A service which notifies customers when a domain name is registered or a trademark application is filed. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |