USPTO serial 78200531
MUSCLEJACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3107473Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 20, 2006
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MUSCLEJACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MARTINEZ, CA
MARTINEZ, CA
MARTINEZ, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD ESTY PETERSON
RICHARD ESTY PETERSON Richard Esty Peterson537 Valley StreetSan Francisco, CA 94131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplements, incorporating eurycoma longifolia jack to maximize testosterone levels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 24, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2006 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |