Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78203747?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78203747. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns ALPHAGLYCANOLOGY?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78203747, the listed owner(s) include: MACROFOOD LLC, MACROFOOD LLC.

What is USPTO serial number 78203747?

Serial number 78203747 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark ALPHAGLYCANOLOGY. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of ALPHAGLYCANOLOGY?

ALPHAGLYCANOLOGY (78203747) currently shows USPTO status code 614 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover ALPHAGLYCANOLOGY?

The public record lists International Classes: 005. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78203747

ALPHAGLYCANOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614

Filing date: Jan 15, 2003
Status date: Apr 13, 2007
Registration date: —
Examiner: PRICE, WANDA
Law office: PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALPHAGLYCANOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

MACROFOOD LLC
MONROVIA, CA
Other trademarks owned by MACROFOOD LLC
MACROFOOD LLC
MONROVIA, CA
Other trademarks owned by MACROFOOD LLC

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SCOTT R. WARREN

SCOTT R WARREN WELLMAN & WARREN LLP24411 RDG RT STE 200LAGUNA HILLS CA, 92653U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
005	NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 13, 2007	PETD	PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED	—
Mar 6, 2007	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Mar 6, 2007	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
Nov 30, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 24, 2006	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 22, 2006	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 5, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2006	CNRT	SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Mar 10, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 10, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2006	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Mar 10, 2006	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Feb 1, 2006	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2006	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 5, 2005	PINM	INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED	—
May 16, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2005	CNRT	SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2005	SUPC	STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
May 6, 2005	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
Apr 11, 2005	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Jan 31, 2005	PETL	COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER	—
Jan 31, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Nov 25, 2004	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Nov 25, 2004	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
Nov 25, 2004	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Aug 27, 2004	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Aug 27, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jul 20, 2004	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 21, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jun 16, 2004	LSOU	LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE	—
May 25, 2004	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Nov 25, 2003	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 2, 2003	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2003	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Jun 29, 2003	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Jun 25, 2003	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—