Drawing for FIREEYE

USPTO serial 78204534

FIREEYE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIREEYE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. John Campaign

H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN PC36 W 44TH ST STE 1300NEW YORK NY, 10036 8178U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic apparatus that are attached to the firefighters' protective clothing, helmets, visors, driver oxygen masks, vests and air tubes that incorporate a micro display, an optical module, a combiner and an infrared camera to assist firefighters to see in a dark or smoky environmentACTIVE
041Educational and training services, namely conducting training classes in the field of firefighting; arranging and conducting seminars and workshops in the field of firefightingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Sep 20, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 5, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 19, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance