CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ZEOS

USPTO serial 78205055

ZEOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSBORNE, STANLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZEOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Margaret H. Bitler

SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005pharmaceutical preparations, namely cardiovascular preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 31, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 11, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 11, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 29, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 30, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance