USPTO serial 78206560
SONARTRAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3203033Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2007
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SONARTRAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald L. DePardo
JAMIE JOHNSON FITZGERALD DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLCPO BOX 190199 MAIN STBURLINGTON, VT 05402-0190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Industrial sensing, monitoring, instrumentation and measurement devices, namely, flowmeters, clamp-on flowmeters, flow rate monitors, mass flow rate meters, volumetric flow rate meters, fluid flow monitors, pressure sensors, arrays of pressure sensors, strain sensors, temperature sensors, acoustic sensors, leak detectors, consistency meters, density meters, steam meters, steam wetness meters, steam quality meters, steam enthalpy meters, air/fuel ratio meters, gas/fuel ratio meters, pulverized fuel meters, gas flowmeters, liquid flowmeters, gas-volume fraction meters, and speed-of-sound monitors, composition monitoring equipment, namely, consistency meters, water/cut meters, density meters, mass flow meters, total air meters; computers, processors and controllers for monitoring, processing, and analysis of data; computer software for installing, performing diagnostic tests on, setting operating parameters in, and repairing industrial sensing, monitoring, instrumentation and measurement devices; computer software for receiving and transferring data from industrial sensing, monitoring, instrumentation and measurement devices for analysis in other computer software; computer software for updating software in industrial sensing, monitoring, instrumentation and measurement devices; computer firmware for use in industrial sensing, monitoring, instrumentation and measurement devices; digital memory storage devices; and electrical plugs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 6, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |