USPTO serial 78206564
SUN GOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUN GOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig J.J. Snyder
CRAIG JJ SNYDER CRAIG J.J. SNYDER PC67 WALL ST22ND FL N 5719NEW YORK NY, 10005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Personal care and grooming products, namely, suntan lotions and oils, sun block, sunscreen preparations, indoor tanning lotion, skin moisturizers, skin, hand, facial and body cleansers, creams and lotions; shaving products, creams, lotions, balms and gels; skin cleansing creams, lotions and gels; anti-wrinkle creams lotions, balms and gels; cosmetic eye cream, balm and gel; deodorants, antiperspirants, astringents for the face and skin, bath oil, bath beads, bath salts, cologne, aftershave lotion; pre-moistened towelettes containing sun tan gels, oils, creams and lotions; hair conditioner, hair dyes, hair highlighter, hair mascara, hair pomade, hair rinses, hair removing crams, hair shampoo, hair spray, hair straightener, hair styling gel, hair styling mousse | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |