Drawing for CODE FOCUS

USPTO serial 78208854

CODE FOCUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CODE FOCUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Henry M. Pogorzelski

RAYMOND R FERRERA ARNOLD & FERRERA LLP2401 FOUNTAIN VIEW DR STE 630HOUSTON, TX 77057UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Magazine in the field of computer software developmentABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
May 24, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
May 24, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
May 24, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Apr 20, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Apr 3, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Mar 25, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Mar 2, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 20, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 20, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance