USPTO serial 78213399
FRESH-ZIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRESH-ZIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Liss
MARK J LISS LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTDTWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO IL, 60601U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Resealable packaging, namely, rolls of plastic film with interlocking closures used to form or pouches for packaging food and used in the further manufacture of bags or pouches for packaging food | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 24, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |