USPTO serial 78215859
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq.
JONATHAN D REICHMAN ESQ KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing online educational classes and seminars in the field of primary and secondary education for use by parents, students and teachers | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |