USPTO serial 78221047
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PHOENIX PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS INC.
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Slattery (Reg. No. 28,380)
JAMES M SLATTERY REG NO 28 380 BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH VA, 22040 0747U.S. ARMY| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective helmets, safety equipment, namely, safety helmets for equestrian sports | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing for equestrian sports, namely, shirts, pants, vests; footwear; headgear, namely hats, caps | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Safety equipment, namely safety padding for equestrian sports | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 26, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 26, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |