Drawing for PRODUCTIVITY

USPTO serial 78224674

PRODUCTIVITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRODUCTIVITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Akana K.J. Ma

KJ AKANA MA ATER WYNNE LLP222 SW COLUMBIA ST STE 1800PORTLAND, OR 97201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business consulting services to improve efficiency in manufacturing industriesACTIVEAug 25, 1981
041training services to improve efficiency in manufacturing industriesACTIVEAug 25, 1981

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 12, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 24, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 24, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 26, 2007GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 2, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 9, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 8, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 16, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance