Drawing for PRODUCTIVITY

USPTO serial 78224674

PRODUCTIVITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRODUCTIVITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Akana K.J. Ma

KJ AKANA MA ATER WYNNE LLP222 SW COLUMBIA ST STE 1800PORTLAND, OR 97201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business consulting services to improve efficiency in manufacturing industriesACTIVEAug 25, 1981
041training services to improve efficiency in manufacturing industriesACTIVEAug 25, 1981

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 12, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 24, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 24, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jun 26, 2007GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Jun 26, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Jun 26, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
May 2, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 9, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 8, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jan 8, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Oct 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 17, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 16, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 5, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 7, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 31, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 24, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jul 23, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 14, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 10, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance