Drawing for SOUNDBODY

USPTO serial 78226939

SOUNDBODY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOUNDBODY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hayden R. Brainard

HAYDEN R BRAINARD JR MILLER MAYER LLP202 E STATE ST STE 700ITHACA, NY 14850UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRE-RECORDED AUDIOCASSETTES AND COMPACT DISCS FEATURING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF FITNESS INSTRUCTIONACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 4, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 6, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 6, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Aug 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 29, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 16, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 5, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 5, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 5, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Aug 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 17, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 12, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 8, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Oct 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 25, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance