Drawing for L600

USPTO serial 78228252

L600

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with L600?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S EGBERT HARRISON & EGBERT412 MAIN ST FL 7HOUSTON, TX 77002-1838UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Electric and non-electric hair removal devices for personal use, namely, tweezers, beard trimmers, moustache trimmers, hair clippers, and electric razors; depilation appliances, namely, electric and non-electric hair removing tweezers; beard clippers; electric and non-electric hair clippers for personal use; shaving casesACTIVE
010Medical devices, namely, physical exercise rehabilitation devices for medical purposes, namely, invalid walkers, exercise floor platforms, manually operated resistive muscle exercise equipment; electric body massagers for therapeutic purposes; quartz lamps for medical use; medical apparatus and instruments, namely, thermometers, blood pressure monitors, heart monitors, respirators for artificial respiration, defibrillatorsACTIVE
044Beauty salon services for others, hairdressing salon services for othersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 22, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 22, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 20, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 20, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 4, 200344EDSEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED
Sep 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 4, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance