Drawing for HIGH BEAM

USPTO serial 78229811

HIGH BEAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIGH BEAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne M. Sterba

ANNE M STERBA ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON DC, 20005U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES REGARDING THE STRATEGIC NATURE OF PROMOTIONAL, ADVERTISING AND MARKETING CAMPAIGNS FOR BUSINESSESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Feb 22, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Feb 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 14, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 13, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jan 31, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Aug 18, 2004LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED
Aug 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 20, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 14, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 23, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance