Drawing for GROVE SQUEEZED

USPTO serial 78230077

GROVE SQUEEZED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3012334Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 1, 2005
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with GROVE SQUEEZED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Michael Hurst

J MICHAEL HURST DINSMORE & SHOHL, LLP1900 CHEMED CTR 255 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI OH, 45202U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Fruit juicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 25, 2004
040On-site processing of citrus fruit for othersSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 25, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Jul 26, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Nov 1, 2005R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Sep 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 23, 2005CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
Jun 23, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Jun 21, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Aug 13, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 9, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jun 28, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 28, 2004EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 16, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance