Drawing for CLEAN POWER

USPTO serial 78238376

CLEAN POWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OSLICK, SCOTT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEAN POWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. Waters

JOHN A WATERS VARNUM RIDDERING SCHMIDT HOWLETT LLPPO BOX 352GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-0352UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Wholesale and retail distributorships of cleaning and sanitation products, supplies and equipment to food service establishmentsACTIVEDec 1, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 30, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 30, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 30, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jan 26, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 26, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 25, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jul 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 20, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 24, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance