Drawing for HAPPY DOG

USPTO serial 78239583

HAPPY DOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAPPY DOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey R. Cohen

Jeffrey R. Cohen Millen White Zelano & Branigan2200 Clarendon Blvd. Suite 1400Arlington VA, VA 22201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016(Based on Use in Commerce) Books, namely children's books; writing paper and envelopes, paint brushes, printed instructional teaching materials and teaching materials, namely crayons, pens, pencils, marks, erasers, paper lunchbags, calendars, drawing paper, tables, memo pads, greeting cards, posters, paper portfolios, paper banners, pen holders, checkbooks and checkbook covers, paper and plastic merchandise packaging bags, address books, diaries, book marks, lithographs, art etchings, art mounts, art pads, art paper art pictures, art prints, colored craft and art sand, graphic art reproductions, photographic or art mounts, printed art reproductions, notebooks, stickers, posters, calendars, paintings, stationeryACTIVE
028(Based on Use in Commerce) Puzzles, games and toys, namely manipulative games, board games, toy cars, toy trains, dolls and playing cardsACTIVE
041(Based on Intent to Use) Entertainment services in the nature of on-going animated television programs in the field of news, comedy, variety, arts and children's programmingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Feb 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Aug 16, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Aug 16, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Aug 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 16, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 16, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 16, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 24, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 2, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 23, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 5, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance