USPTO serial 78239621
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Gemenos, FR
Gemenos, FR
Gemenos, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRED W HATHAWAY
FRED W HATHAWAY BUCHANAN INGERSOLL PCPO BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus and equipment, namely computers, computer peripherals, telephones, and electronic chip card readers, for communicating with electronic chip cards; computer software for use in and for enabling communication between electronic chip cards and apparatus and equipment, namely computers, computer peripherals, telephones, and electronic chip card readers, used to communicate with electronic chip cards; encoded electronic chip cards, namely cards with integrated circuit chips, smart cards, microprocessor cards, and memory cards, for identifying the users thereof | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | User instruction manuals for apparatus and equipment, namely computers, computer peripherals, telephones, and electronic chip card readers, used to communicate with electronic chip cards; User instruction manuals for electronic chip cards; User instruction manuals for computer software for use in electronic chip cards and apparatus and equipment, namely computers, computer peripherals, telephones, and electronic chip card readers, used to communicate with electronic chip cards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Consultation in the field of design, selection, and implementation for others of electronic chip cards and apparatus and equipment, namely computers, computer peripherals, telephones, and electronic chip card readers, used to communicate with electronic chip cards; Consultation in the field of design, selection, and implementation for others of computer software for use in electronic chip cards and apparatus and equipment, namely computers, computer peripherals, telephones, and electronic chip card readers, used to communicate with electronic chip cards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |