USPTO serial 78240133
COMBATSWORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3508626Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 2008
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMBATSWORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ROAD TOWN, TORTOLA, VG
ROAD TOWN, TORTOLA, VG
ROAD TOWN, TORTOLA, VG
Chichester, GB
Tortola, VG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisabeth H. Coakley
Lisabeth H. Coakley Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC5445 Corporate Drive, Suite 200Troy, MI 48098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, electronic mail services; Internet communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data via the Internet, satellite communication services; providing telephone communications via global communication and computer networks; transmission of messages amongst remote users via telephone, on-line, cable, satellite, cellular and wireless communications; electronic transmissions of data, images, and documents via computer terminals and networks; electronic forwarding messaging via global communications networks, satellite, cable and telephone; broadcasting services, namely, broadcasting and delivery of audio, video, and/or multimedia content by means of radio, cellular, and wireless communications, television, cable television, closed circuit, electronic communications or computer networks; paging services; telephone communications services; providing multiple user access to bulletin boards and communications and computer networks for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of data and information; telecommunications gateway services, namely, providing an online link to news, weather, sports, current events, and reference materials; providing on-line bulletin boards for the transmission of messages among computer users concerning a wide range of data and information in the field of toys and computer games; providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among communications and computer network users; services for communication between multimedia devices and apparatus, games consoles, portable electronic and electronic gaming apparatus and equipment, computers and other data processing apparatus and equipment adapted for the playing of games | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIAMOND SCENT LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by DIAMOND SCENT LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by DIAMOND SCENT LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by V.I.&I.V. Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by LUCIUS GROUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named COMBATSWORLD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 21, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |