USPTO serial 78240187
COMBATSWORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMBATSWORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ROAD TOWN, TORTOLA, VG
ROAD TOWN, TORTOLA, VG
Chichester, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan C. Shin, Esq. and Zeynel Karcioglu, Esq.
Susan C. Shin, Esq. and Zeynel Karcioglu, Esq. Zeynel Karcioglu, Esq36 East 20th Street, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, providing computer games and video games that may be accessed by users over a local or global computer network, by WAP, or wireless network; gaming services, namely, leasing of electronic gaming machines; rental of computer and video game software over a local or global computer network, by WAP or wireless network; providing information relating to computer games and video and computer enhancements for the same via the Internet; production of radio and television programs in the field of computer and video gaming; multimedia entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the fields of music, video, and motion picture films; production of video and computer game software, and music, graphics and video used in conjunction with the same for others; organizing and arranging interactive video and computer gaming competitions, conferences, and meetings relating to computer and video games; production and distribution of television, radio and telephone programs in the field of video and computer games; organization and arranging of competitions, tournaments, contests, games and quizzes in the field of gaming; providing entertainment services in the nature of multiple-player computer games over a local or global computer network, wireless network, or WAP; providing on-line, non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of electronic magazines and newsletters in the field of video and computer gaming; providing educational, instructional and information services in the nature of classes, seminars and workshops in the field of video games, computer games and gaming, all provided by means of radio, television, telephone, wireless telegraphy, microwave; rental of computer and video games, video recordings, cinematographic films, compact discs, DVDs, CD-ROMS, ROM cartridges CDs, DVDs, CD-ROMS, ROM cartridges, CDPs, CDIs, and computer hardware for use with playing computer and video games; provision of information via the Internet on topics relating to computer games, video games and on-line computer games; providing online database in the fields of computer gaming and video and computer games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIAMOND SCENT LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by DIAMOND SCENT LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by V.I.&I.V. Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named COMBATSWORLD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| May 26, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |