USPTO serial 78240925
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hoffman Estates, IL
Hoffman Estates, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea G. Hilborn
DONALD A DEGNAN HOLLAND & HART LLP1050 WALNUT ST STE 500BOULDER, CO 80302UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Clothes washing machines | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |