Drawing for CANTI

USPTO serial 78241185

CANTI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANTI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific, optical, weighing measuring, signalling, checking (supervision) apparatus and instruments, and data processing equipment and computers, including diagnostic apparatus (not for medical purposes), biochips, scientific, analytical and diagnostic apparatus and instruments, detectors, parts for the mentioned goods (not included in other classes)ACTIVE
010Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, including diagnostic apparatus and instruments, diagnostic test kits, biochips and biochips for implantationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Dec 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance