Drawing for MELCO DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 78242858

MELCO DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3134840Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 29, 2006
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MELCO DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PERLA M. KUHN

PERLA M. KUHN Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLPF.D.R. StationP.O. Box 130New York, NY 10150

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Liquid crystal display monitors for use with computer and television receivers; liquid crystal display modules, namely, display units combining liquid crystal display cells with drive electronics, for use with computers and television receivers; computers; television receiversSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2012C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL
Dec 4, 2012C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED
Dec 4, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 4, 2012ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED
Apr 15, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 29, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 6, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 17, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 24, 2006AMPBAMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED
Apr 24, 2006ADBS1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED
Apr 24, 2006IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
Mar 23, 2006PCBGPETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED
Jan 20, 2006PDCBPETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED
Jan 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 23, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 3, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 18, 2005REINREINSTATED
Jan 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 19, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Dec 22, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 22, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 23, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance