USPTO serial 78245709
MAX PROTECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3209533Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 13, 2007
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAX PROTECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KENT, WA
KENT, WA
KENT, WA
KENT, WA
KENT, WA
KENT, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DIRK A BARTRAM
DIRK A BARTRAM HENKE BARTRAM PLLC1001 4TH AVE STE 3200SEATTLE, WA 98154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Plastic storage containers to display and store collectibles, toys, sports memorabilia and trading cards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAX PROTECTION
- Other trademarks owned by MAX PROTECTION
- Other trademarks owned by MAX PROTECTION
- Other trademarks owned by MAX PROTECTION
- Other trademarks owned by MAX PROTECTION
- Other trademarks owned by MAX PROTECTION
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named MAX PROTECTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 6, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 31, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |