Drawing for MONTINI

USPTO serial 78245856

MONTINI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MONTINI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

STEPHEN L BAKER BAKER AND RANNELLS PA575 ROUTE 28SUITE 102RARITAN, NJ 08869

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Cheeses, grated cheese, grated food toppings comprised of imitation cheese and lesser ingredientsACTIVE—
030Spices, pasta, macaroni and cheese, bread crumbs and cracker mealsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 4, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2007INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jan 13, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 26, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 16, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 8, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 5, 2004GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2004GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance