USPTO serial 78247184
MONO BLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2914466Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 28, 2004
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MONO BLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claudia W. Stangle
Claudia W. Stangle LEYDIG, VOIT & MAYER, LTD.Two Prudential Plaza, 180 N. Stetson AveSuite 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601-6731Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools, namely, milling and boring machines, lathes, and power drills; machining centers which consist of milling and boring machines, lathes, and/or power drills; numerically controlled machining equipment for controlling the aforementioned machines; parts and accessories for the aforementioned machines, namely, machine operated tools, namely, drills, milling cutters, turning tools, and grinders, and machine tool tables, motor-driven handling devices for handling tools and workpieces, fixtures for clamping workpieces, namely, metal clamps used for holding piece parts on machine tool tables, tool changers for changing tools between tool magazines and tool spindles, tool magazines containing tools for milling and drilling, workpiece magazines, tool spindles, and flexible machining cells consisting of circular dividing apparatus, dividing plates, dividing attachments and circular tables; industrial robots with control devices, and mechanical conveyors; electrically-operated, hydraulically-operated, and pneumatically-operated vices for use with machine tools; work piece pallet changers for the machine tools listed above | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Hand-operated vices for use with machine tools | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Electrical controllers for machine tools; measuring and testing apparatus for machine tools, namely, dial test indicators, dial gauges, namely, test arbors, adjusting pins, and tool presetters for milling, turning and boring tools | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DECKEL MAHO Pfronten GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by DECKEL MAHO Pfronten GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by DECKEL MAHO Pfronten GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MONO BLOCK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 28, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 2, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 2, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |