USPTO serial 78248575
BIOSPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOSPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE A. MAXHAM
LAWRENCE A MAXHAM THE MAXHAM FIRM750 "B" ST STE 3100SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | massage preparations, namely, oils, lotions, creams, non-medicated balms, gels; perfume, eau de perfume, perfume oil, essential oils for personal use, scented body spray, body lotion, body cream, hand cream, toilet soap, non-medicated bath salts, bath foam, bath oil, bath and shower gel, talcum powder, dusting powder, makeup remover, skin cleansing scrub, facial cleaner, eye cream, facial cream, facial lotion, facial mask, facial skin toner, lip moisturizer, non-medicated lip balm, skin lightener, sun tanning gel, sun tanning lotion, sun tanning oil, sun tanning cream, sun tanning spray, pre-moistened towelettes containing sun screen, lipstick, lip liner, lip gloss, facial foundation, facial powder, facial concealer, blush, mascara, eyebrow pencil, eyeshadow, eye liner, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair gel, hair mousse, hair spray, nail enamel, nail strengthener, nail polish base coat, nail polish top coat, cuticle conditioner | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |