Drawing for RIO GRANDE

USPTO serial 78250814

RIO GRANDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RIO GRANDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James H. Walters

JAMES H WALTERS DELLETT & WALTERSPO BOX 2786PORTLAND, OR 97208-2786UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non-alcoholic beverages; tomato juice; apple juice; vegetable juices; fruit juices; fruit beverages; fruit nectars; Non-alcoholic beverages; tomato juice; apple juice; vegetable juices; fruit juices; fruit beverages; fruit nectarsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 20, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 20, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 20, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 14, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 11, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance