USPTO serial 78251397
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DEERFIELD BEACH, FL
DEERFIELD BEACH, FL
Lakeside, CA
Lakeside, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Kenney
ROBERT J KENNEY BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Environmental remediation, namely, cleaning and disposal of mold from commercial buildings, homes, and educational facilities; and construction and repair of commercial buildings, homes and educational facilities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |